Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Luther J. West, Respondent, v. Richard B. Hoag, Appellant, 1875 — 65 N.Y. 569 · caselaw · US
General
Luther J. West, Respondent, v. Richard B. Hoag, Appellant
65 N.Y. 569·New York Commission of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Luther J. West, Respondent, v. Richard B. Hoag, Appellant.
(Argued January 12, 1875;
decided May term, 1875.)
The principal questions presented in this case were as to the reception and rejection of evidence, which were disposed of in view of the facts.
Wm. S. Farnell for the appellant.
A. K. Potter for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, C.,]
Earl, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.