Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People's Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The Mechanics' National Bank of Newark, New Jersey, Respondent, 1882 — 89 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
The People's Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The Mechanics' National Bank of Newark, New Jersey, Respondent
89 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1882·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People’s Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The Mechanics’ National Bank of Newark, New Jersey, Respondent.
(Submitted June 27, 1882 ;
decided June 30, 1882.)
This was a motion to remit the return to the court below for amendment. It was denied for reasons stated in opinion in National Shoe and Leather Bank v. The Mechanics’ National Bank (ante, 440).
Cray dh Davenport for motion.
Aaron Pennington Whitehead opposed.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads mem. for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied. .