Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Frank et al., Appellants, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., 1916 — 241 U.S. 694 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Frank et al., Appellants, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al.
241 U.S. 694·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 727.
Charles Frank et al., Appellants, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
June 12, 1916.
Mr. Samuel Untermyer, Mr. Louis Marshall, Mr. Myron L. Learned and Mr. Abraham Benedict for the appellants. Mr. N. H. Loomis for the appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellants.