Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Texas v. New Mexico et al., 1939 — 308 U.S. 510 · caselaw · US
General
Texas v. New Mexico et al.
308 U.S. 510·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10,
original.
Texas v. New Mexico et al.
October 16, 1939.
[MAJORITY]
The Special Master having presented his final report stating that the cause has been settled, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:
L The report of the Special Master is received, filed, and confirmed.
2. The bill of complaint is dismissed.
3. The Special Mastér is directed to return to the proper parties the original copies of the record of the testimony and the exhibits introduced into evidence before him.
4. Costs, including the compensation and expenses of the Special Master, shall be paid one-half by the State of Texas and one-half by the State of New Mexico and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District, the State of Texas to be reimbursed by the State of New Mexico and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District to the extent of one-half of all sums heretofore disbursed by it on account of expenses of the Special Master.
(Earlier phases of this litigation are reported in 296 U. S. 547; 297 U. S. 693, 698; 298 U. S. 639, 644; 300 U. S. 645; 302 U. S. 658; 304 U. S. 551.)