Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Cunningham v. Kelley et ux.; Phillips v. City of Renton, Washington; Washington v. Florida Department of Children and Families; Walker v. Honyaouma; Villegas et al. v. Berrios Castrodad et al.; Vaughan v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security; Khan v. Bland et al.; Green v. Mabus, Secretary of the Navy; Voinche v. Obama, President of the United States, et al.; Burns v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minnesota. In re Burns et al.; Neal v. Ford Motor Co.; Fowler v. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury; Whitby v. Office of Personnel Management; White v. United States; Mitchell v. Dallas Housing Authority; Kinane et al. v. United States; Welenc v. Florida (two judgments). In re Grayton; Wheeler-Christ v. Montgomery County, Maryland; Jacobson et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al.; Bafford v. Midfirst Bank et al.; Tran v. Newport News Holding Corp.; Phillips v. James et al.; Ceslik v. Miller Ford, Inc.; Ochoa v. Rubin; Reyes v. United States; Ewing v. United States; Brown v. United States; Latos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2011 — 565 U.S. 811 · caselaw · US