Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cunningham v. Kelley et ux.; Phillips v. City of Renton, Washington; Washington v. Florida Department of Children and Families; Walker v. Honyaouma; Villegas et al. v. Berrios Castrodad et al.; Vaughan v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security; Khan v. Bland et al.; Green v. Mabus, Secretary of the Navy; Voinche v. Obama, President of the United States, et al.; Burns v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minnesota. In re Burns et al.; Neal v. Ford Motor Co.; Fowler v. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury; Whitby v. Office of Personnel Management; White v. United States; Mitchell v. Dallas Housing Authority; Kinane et al. v. United States; Welenc v. Florida (two judgments). In re Grayton; Wheeler-Christ v. Montgomery County, Maryland; Jacobson et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al.; Bafford v. Midfirst Bank et al.; Tran v. Newport News Holding Corp.; Phillips v. James et al.; Ceslik v. Miller Ford, Inc.; Ochoa v. Rubin; Reyes v. United States; Ewing v. United States; Brown v. United States; Latos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2011 — 565 U.S. 811 · caselaw · US
Tax
Cunningham v. Kelley et ux.; Phillips v. City of Renton, Washington; Washington v. Florida Department of Children and Families; Walker v. Honyaouma; Villegas et al. v. Berrios Castrodad et al.; Vaughan v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security; Khan v. Bland et al.; Green v. Mabus, Secretary of the Navy; Voinche v. Obama, President of the United States, et al.; Burns v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minnesota. In re Burns et al.; Neal v. Ford Motor Co.; Fowler v. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury; Whitby v. Office of Personnel Management; White v. United States; Mitchell v. Dallas Housing Authority; Kinane et al. v. United States; Welenc v. Florida (two judgments). In re Grayton; Wheeler-Christ v. Montgomery County, Maryland; Jacobson et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al.; Bafford v. Midfirst Bank et al.; Tran v. Newport News Holding Corp.; Phillips v. James et al.; Ceslik v. Miller Ford, Inc.; Ochoa v. Rubin; Reyes v. United States; Ewing v. United States; Brown v. United States; Latos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
565 U.S. 811·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-10217.
No. 10-10310.
No. 10-10511.
No. 10-10536.
No. 10-10607.
No. 10-10629.
No. 10-10651.
No. 10-10726.
No. 10-10866.
No. 10-11038.
No. 10-11039.
No. 10-11180.
No. 10-11262.
No. 10-11281.
No. 11-5041.
No. 11-5058.
No. 11-5073.
No. 11-5149.
No. 11-5218.
Cunningham v. Kelley et ux. Phillips v. City of Renton, Washington. Washington v. Florida Department of Children and Families. Walker v. Honyaouma. Villegas et al. v. Berrios Castrodad et al. Vaughan v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. Khan v. Bland et al. Green v. Mabus, Secretary of the Navy. Voinche v. Obama, President of the United States, et al. Burns v. Commissioner of Revenue of Minnesota. In re Burns et al.; Neal v. Ford Motor Co. Fowler v. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury. Whitby v. Office of Personnel Management. White v. United States. Mitchell v. Dallas Housing Authority. Kinane et al. v. United States. Welenc v. Florida (two judgments). In re Grayton; Wheeler-Christ v. Montgomery County, Maryland. Jacobson et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al. Bafford v. Midfirst Bank et al. Tran v. Newport News Holding Corp. Phillips v. James et al. Ceslik v. Miller Ford, Inc. Ochoa v. Rubin. Reyes v. United States. Ewing v. United States. Brown v. United States. Latos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[MAJORITY]
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist.;
Sup. Ct. Wash.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. P. R.;
C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. 7th Cir.;
C. A. 3d Cir.;
C. A. D. C. Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Minn.;
C. A. 6th Cir.;
C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. Fed. Cir.;
C. A. Armed Forces;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
Ct. App. D. C.;
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist.;
No. 11-5381.
No. 11-5384.
No. 11-5417.
No. 11-5433.
No. 11-5549.
No. 11-5554.
No. 11-5664.
No. 11-5682.
No. 11-5687.
No. 11-5886.
No. 11-5954.
C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. 3d Cir.;
C. A. 2d Cir.;
Super. Ct. Pa.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. 4th Cir.; and
C. A. 1st Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.