Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 1941 — 314 U.S. 618 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
314 U.S. 618·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 349.
Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission.
October 13, 1941.
Messrs. John Foster Dulles and Oscar C. Hull for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Arnold Raum, Chester T. Lane, Christopher M. Jenks, Lawrence S. Lesser, J. Leonard Townsend, and Homer Kripke for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.