Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sangamon Valley Television Corp. et al. v. United States et al., 1964 — 376 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
General
Sangamon Valley Television Corp. et al. v. United States et al.
376 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 700.
Sangamon Valley Television Corp. et al. v. United States et al.
D. M. Patrick for Sangamon Valley Television Corp.; and William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and M. Brooks Byus, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Illinois, petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Max D. Paglin, Daniel R. Ohlbaum and Ruth V. Reel for the United States et al.; Monroe Oppenheimer and Isadore G. Aik for Signal Hill Telecasting Corp.; and James A. McKenna, Jr. and Vernon L. Wilkinson for American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.