Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Granite State Provident Association et al., Defendants; David A. Taggart, as Assignee, Appellant, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Granite State Provident Association et al., Defendants; David A. Taggart, as Assignee, Appellant
160 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Granite State Provident Association et al., Defendants; David A. Taggart, as Assignee, Appellant.
(Submitted October 2, 1899;
decided October 10, 1899.)
Reported below, 41 App. Div. 257.
Motion to place upon the present calendar an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in-the second judicial department, entered July 29,1899, modifying, and affirming as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal is entitled to a preference under subdivision 1, section 79.1, Code of Civil Procedure, it being an action brought by the People.
John C. Davies, Attorney-General, for motion.
[MAJORITY]
No one opposed.
Motion granted, without costs.