Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pennington et al. v. United Mine Workers of America, 1968 — 393 U.S. 983 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Pennington et al. v. United Mine Workers of America
393 U.S. 983·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. · Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 558.
Pennington et al. v. United Mine Workers of America.
John A. Rowntree and Robert S. Young, Jr., for petitioners.
Edward L. Carey, Harrison Combs, Willard P. Owens, E. H. Ray son, and M. E. Boiarsky for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.