General
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
382 U.S. 368·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 556.
Decided January 17, 1966.
Paul R. Duke and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Neil Brooks, Robert W. Ginnane and I. K. Hay for the United States et al. Leo A. Larkin, Samuel Mandell, Sidney Goldstein, F. A. Mulhern, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for appellee Port of New York Authority.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.