Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Duffus, Appellant, v. Eli T. Bangs et al., Respondents, 1892 — 131 N.Y. 568 · caselaw · US
General
William Duffus, Appellant, v. Eli T. Bangs et al., Respondents
131 N.Y. 568·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Duffus, Appellant, v. Eli T. Bangs et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 20, 1892;
decided February 2, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made July 7, 1891, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit, and granted a motion to vacate an assessment of damages.
Walter S. MacGregor for appellant.
T. K. Fuller for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed on argument.
All concur.