Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, LOCAL 627, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES et al., 1969 — 393 U.S. 480 · caselaw · US
General
PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, LOCAL 627, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES et al.
393 U.S. 480·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, LOCAL 627, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 790.
Decided January 27, 1969.
Louis Waldman and Seymour M. Waldman for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington, 381 U. S. 657; American Federation of Musicians v. Carroll, 391 U. S. 99; and Los Angeles Meat Drivers Union v. United States, 371 U. S. 94.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.