Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WESTERN POWER, LIGHT & TELEPHONE COMPANY et al. v. CITY OF WOODWARD, OKLAHOMA et al., 1931 — 50 F.2d 1087 · caselaw · US
General
WESTERN POWER, LIGHT & TELEPHONE COMPANY et al. v. CITY OF WOODWARD, OKLAHOMA et al.
50 F.2d 1087·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTERN POWER, LIGHT & TELEPHONE COMPANY et al. v. CITY OF WOODWARD, OKLAHOMA et al.
No. 443.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
June 1, 1931.
Howard W. Patton, of Woodward, Okl., W. R. Bleakmore and John Barry, both of Oklahoma City, OH., for appellants.
J. B. Dudley, of OHahoma City, Okl., Y. Q. Caldwell, Jr., of Paris, Tenn., and C. W. Herod, of Woodward, OH., for appellees.
Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and Mc-DERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed June 1,1931, per stipulation.