General
Katie Moeschen, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Tenement House Department of the City of New York
203 U.S. 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 93.
Katie Moeschen, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Tenement House Department of the City of New York.
Argued November 9, 1906.
Decided November 12, 1906.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678; United States v. Des Moines &c. Company, 142 U. S. 510, 544; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325; case below, 89 App. Div. 526; 179 N. Y. 325. And see Health Department v. Rector &c., 145 N. Y. 32; Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, 20 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281.
Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error.