General
Miller v. Pleasure, Hospital Superintendent
370 U.S. 964·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1038,
Mise.
Miller v. Pleasure, Hospital Superintendent.
Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Irving Galt, Assistant Solicitor General, Philip Watson and John J. O’Grady, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The motions to correct the docket and to strike the respondent’s brief are denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.