Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Howard Hall Co., Inc. v. United States et al., 1946 — 328 U.S. 818 · caselaw · US
General
Howard Hall Co., Inc. v. United States et al.
328 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 627.
Howard Hall Co., Inc. v. United States et al.
Argued April 30 and May 1, 1946.
Decided May 6, 1946.
Harold G. Hernly argued the cause for appellant.
With him on the brief was James W. Wrape. Daniel W. Knowlton argued the cause for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
With him on the brief were Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Berge, Edward Dumbauld, David O. Mathews, Nelson Thomas and Allen Crenshaw.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Alton R. Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 15; United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475; Howard Hall Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 495.