Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Association, Inc. et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 802 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Association, Inc. et al.
335 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 89.
United States v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Association, Inc. et al.
George T. Washington, then Acting Solicitor General, for the United States. Elwood H. Seal for the Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc.; William Blum, Jr. for Alexandria Dairy Products Co., Inc.; John J. Wilson for the Chestnut Earms-Chevy Chase Dairy; William E. Leahy and William J. Hughes, Jr. for Derrick; Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and Letitia Armistead for Safeway Stores, Inc.; John F. Hillyard for Simpson Bros., Inc.; and Raymond Sparks for Thompson’s Dairy, Inc., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to transfer are granted and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, § 3731. United States v. Swift & Co., 318 U. S. 442; United States v. Wayne Pump Co., 317 U. S. 200.