Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Herman C. SOMMER, Appellant, v. ROTARY LIFT COMPANY and Peter J. Lunati, Appellees, 1933 — 67 F.2d 1011 · caselaw · US
General
Herman C. SOMMER, Appellant, v. ROTARY LIFT COMPANY and Peter J. Lunati, Appellees
67 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Herman C. SOMMER, Appellant, v. ROTARY LIFT COMPANY and Peter J. Lunati, Appellees.
No. 6847.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 13, 1933.
Raymond Ives Blakeslee and Kelly L. Taulbee, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Williams, Bradbury, MeCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, 111., and Chas. M. Fryer and A. C. Aurieh, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRE CHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of appellant, consented to by counsel for appellee, ordered appeal dismissed; decree of dismissal to be entered; mandate issued forthwith.