Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Yellowstone Pipe Line Co. et al. v. State Board of Equalization of Montana et al., 1961 — 366 U.S. 917 · caselaw · US
General
Yellowstone Pipe Line Co. et al. v. State Board of Equalization of Montana et al.
366 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 851.
Yellowstone Pipe Line Co. et al. v. State Board of Equalization of Montana et al.
Samuel W. McIntosh and Arthur Thad Smith for petitioners. Forrest H. Anderson, Attorney General of Montana, Sidney O. Smith, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Donald A. Garrity, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Montana. Certiorari denied.