Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company, Defendant, and Edgar P. Holdridge, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 527 · caselaw · US
General
Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company, Defendant, and Edgar P. Holdridge, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
186 N.Y. 527·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company, Defendant, and Edgar P. Holdridge, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, C. & R. S. Ry. Co., 111 App. Div. 812, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted October 1, 1906;
decided October 9, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered June 7, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for leave to intervene in the above-entitled proceeding.
The motion was made on the grounds that the order appealed from was not a final order in a special proceeding, but was discretionary, and the Court of Appeals had, therefore, no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Charles E. Hotchkiss for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.