Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jones v. Kennedy et al., 1941 — 314 U.S. 665 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Jones v. Kennedy et al.
314 U.S. 665·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 585.
Jones v. Kennedy et al.
October 20, 1941.
Mr. James J. Laughlin for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Richard H. Demuth, Chester T. Lane, James A. Pike, and Robert E. Kline, Jr. for James M. Landis et ah, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.