Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas F. Mason (successor of Henry R. Pierson), as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Andrew W. Morgan (deceased) et al., Justine M. Cronk, Administratrix, Appellant, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 705 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas F. Mason (successor of Henry R. Pierson), as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Andrew W. Morgan (deceased) et al., Justine M. Cronk, Administratrix, Appellant
121 N.Y. 705·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur, except Peokham, J., not sitting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas F. Mason (successor of Henry R. Pierson), as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Andrew W. Morgan (deceased) et al., Justine M. Cronk, Administratrix, Appellant.
(Argued June 12, 1890;
decided June 24, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made the first Monday of October, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term, granting plaintiff leave to sever the action and to revive the same against Justine M. Cronk, administratrix of defendant Andrew W. Morgan, deceased, and to serve a supplemental summons and complaint.
P. H. Veron for appellant.
William C. Trull for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree-to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Peokham, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.