Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick M. Haverty, Respondent, v. Edward P. Barker et al., Commissioners, Constituting the Board of Taxes and Assessments in the City of New York, Appellants, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
Tax
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick M. Haverty, Respondent, v. Edward P. Barker et al., Commissioners, Constituting the Board of Taxes and Assessments in the City of New York, Appellants
149 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick M. Haverty, Respondent, v. Edward P. Barker et al., Commissioners, Constituting the Board of Taxes and Assessments in the City of New York, Appellants.
People ex rel. v. Barker, 1 App. Div. 532, affirmed.
(Argued May 25, 1896;
decided June 9, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made February 14,1896, which reversed on certiorari a determination of the board of taxes and assessments in the city of New York, removing the relator from the office of tax assessor.
D. J. Dean for appellants.
Thomas C. O'Sullivan and Gilbert D. Lamb for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.