Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Cushman and Denison Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Clipper Manufacturing Company, Respondent, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
IP
The Cushman and Denison Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Clipper Manufacturing Company, Respondent
188 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Cushman and Denison Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Clipper Manufacturing Company, Respondent.
(Argued April 29, 1907;
decided May 10, 1907.)
Cushman & Denison Mfg. Co. v. Clipper Mfg. Co., 110 App. Div. 892, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 8, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action for an injunction to restrain the alleged infringement of a trade mark.
Charles A. Collin for appellant.
Osea/r W. Jeffery for respondent. ■>
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.