Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward D. Farrell, as Receiver of the Cobleskill Quarry Company, Respondent, v. Patrick Ryan et al., Appellants, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
Edward D. Farrell, as Receiver of the Cobleskill Quarry Company, Respondent, v. Patrick Ryan et al., Appellants
183 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward D. Farrell, as Receiver of the Cobleskill Quarry Company, Respondent, v. Patrick Ryan et al., Appellants.
(Argued October 16, 1905;
decided October 27, 1905.)
Farrell v. Ryan, 90 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 9, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court' on trial at Special Term.
W. H. Johnson and Watson Lamont for appellants.
Herman Aaron and John H. Rogan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, C1l J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray and O’Brien, JJ.