Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Margaret M. Fox in Behalf of Edward J. Russell, Appellant, for Writs of Habeas Corpus and Certiorari, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Margaret M. Fox in Behalf of Edward J. Russell, Appellant, for Writs of Habeas Corpus and Certiorari
184 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Margaret M. Fox in Behalf of Edward J. Russell, Appellant, for Writs of Habeas Corpus and Certiorari. The Medical Superintendent of the State Hospital for Insane Patients at Dannemora, Respondent.
Matter of Fox, 110 App. Div. 919, affirmed.
(Submitted March 19, 1906;
decided April 3, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 29, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing writs of habeas corpus and certiorari herein.
Charles E. Le Barbier for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General (Danforth E. Ainsworth of counsel), for respondent
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Chase, J.