Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward Fox, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 637 · caselaw · US
General
Edward Fox, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent
152 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Fox, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent.
Fox v. Mayor, etc., 11 Misc. Rep. 304, affirmed.
(Argued March 3, 1897;
decided March 23, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered respectively February 28 and February 26, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Louis O. Van Doren for appellant.
Francis M. Scott for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.