Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company, 1892 — 148 U.S. 49 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company
148 U.S. 4937 L. Ed. 362·Supreme Court of the United States·1892
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
No. 1159, argued with No. 1073.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Parker for appellants.
Mr. James K. Kelly fbr appellees.
[MAJORITY — Brewer, J.]
Brewer, J.
The questions in this ease are substantially the same as those in No. 1073, United States v. California & Oregon Land Company. It is unnecessary, therefore, to state the facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the same decree of affirmance will be entered.