Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Continental Grain Co. v. City of Buffalo et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 944 · caselaw · US
General
Continental Grain Co. v. City of Buffalo et al.
380 U.S. 944·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 850.
Continental Grain Co. v. City of Buffalo et al.
David S. Jackson, Wilbur H. Hecht and John J. Sullivan for petitioner. Edward J. Desmond and John E. Drury, Jr., for the City of Buffalo; Lee C. Hinslea and Lucian Y. Ray for Kinsman Transit Co.; and Scott H. Elder and Robert M. Hitchcock for Midland Steamship Line, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.