Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Falstaff Brewing Corp. et al. v. Lines, 1956 — 352 U.S. 893 · caselaw · US
General
Falstaff Brewing Corp. et al. v. Lines
352 U.S. 893·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 364.
Falstaff Brewing Corp. et al. v. Lines.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file briefs of National Association of Credit Men, Rocky Mountain Association of Credit Men, Credit Managers Association of Southern California, and the National Paint, Varnish and Lacquer Association, Inc., as amici curiae, denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Arthur P. Shapro for petitioners. Max H. Margolis for respondent.