Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Ten Eyck, Appellant, v. Jesse Ryder, et al., Respondents, 1882 — 89 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Ten Eyck, Appellant, v. Jesse Ryder, et al., Respondents
89 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1882·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Ten Eyck, Appellant, v. Jesse Ryder, et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 28, 1882;
decided June 13, 1882.)
Thomas Nelson for appellant.
Samuel Watson for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Tracy, J.,]
Tracy, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Miller, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.