Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FRANKLIN COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent, 1926 — 17 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
General
FRANKLIN COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent
17 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FRANKLIN COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
October 27, 1926.)
No. 294, Original.
Petition to Review Order of Federal Trade Commission.
Robert E. Moloney, of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.
W. H. Fuller, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to review order of Federal Trade Commission dismissed, without costs to either .party in this court, per stipulation of parties.