Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Commissioners of Central Park, etc., for the Kingsbridge Road, 1875 — 62 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the Commissioners of Central Park, etc., for the Kingsbridge Road
62 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Commissioners of Central Park, etc., for the Kingsbridge Road.
(Argued June 22, 1875;
decided September 21, 1875.)
Reported below, 4 Hun, 599.
James D. Carter for the appellant.
James A. Deering for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Davis, J., in court below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.