Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Phillip H. GEORGE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1927 — 22 F.2d 1011 · caselaw · US
General
Phillip H. GEORGE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
22 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Phillip H. GEORGE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 29, 1927.
No. 5065.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Du Val West, Judge.
Don A. Bliss, of San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff in error.
John D. Hartman, U. S. Atty., of San Antonio, Tex. (Russell B. Wine, Asst. U. S. Atty., of San Antonio, Tex., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.