Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Banque de France v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al., 1942 — 316 U.S. 646 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Banque de France v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al.
316 U.S. 646·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1154.
Banque de France v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al.
May 25, 1942.
Messrs. Frederic B. Coudert and Mahlon B. Doing for appellant. Messrs. John C. Bruton and John Foster Dulles for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as an application for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.