Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
W. S. Keel, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. E. E. Douville, 1906 — 203 U.S. 583 · caselaw · US
General
W. S. Keel, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. E. E. Douville
203 U.S. 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 68.
W. S. Keel, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. E. E. Douville.
Argued October 29 and 30, 1906.
Decided November 5, 1906.
Mr. Wm. R. Harper, Mr. D. W. Harper and Mr. E. M. Barber for appellants. Mr. Walter J. Gez and Mr. E. J. Bowers for ap-pellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Cornell v. Green, 163 U. S. 75, and cases cited.