Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Board of Regents of the University of Texas et al. v. Goldberg, U. S. Circuit Judge, et al., 1967 — 389 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
General
Board of Regents of the University of Texas et al. v. Goldberg, U. S. Circuit Judge, et al.
389 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 368,
Misc.
Board of Regents of the University of Texas et al. v. Goldberg, U. S. Circuit Judge, et al.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, J. C. Davis, W. O. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., on the motion.
David R. Richards for Gilmore et al., in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.