Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Sugden et al., Respondents, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 615 · caselaw · US
General
John Sugden et al., Respondents, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant
167 N.Y. 615·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Sugden et al., Respondents, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant.
(Submitted June 3, 1901;
decided June 11, 1901.)
Reported below, 58 App. Div. 236.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 12, 1901, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the appeal does not present a substantial question of law for review, is wholly without merit and is taken for purposes of delay only.
Constcmt (& Coghill for motion.
Nichols c& Bacon opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.