Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Cox et al. v. Thompson et al.; and Thompson et al. v. Park Savings Bank et al.
305 U.S. 606·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78.
No. 204.
Cox et al. v. Thompson et al.; and Thompson et al. v. Park Savings Bank et al.
October 10, 1938.
Messrs. Joseph T. Sherier, Otis Beall Kent, J. S. Flannery, and A. A. Hoehling, Jr. for petitioners in No. 78.
Messrs. Sherier, Kent, Flannery, and Adolph A. Hoehling for respondents in No. 204.
Messrs. E. Hilton Jackson, William E. Richardson, J. Bruce Kremer, and Herbert M. Bing- ham for respondents in No. 78.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Messrs. E. Hilton Jackson and William E. Richardson for petitioners in No. 204.
Reported below: No. 204, 68 App. D. C. 272; 96 F. 2d 544.