Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, Petitioner, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company et al.; Morton Trust Company, Petitioner, v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York et al.; and Metropolitan Securities Company, Petitioner, v. William W. Ladd, Receiver, etc., 1909 — 215 U.S. 603 · caselaw · US
Securities
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, Petitioner, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company et al.; Morton Trust Company, Petitioner, v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York et al.; and Metropolitan Securities Company, Petitioner, v. William W. Ladd, Receiver, etc.
215 U.S. 603·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 635.
No. 636.
No. 654.
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, Petitioner, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company et al.; Morton Trust Company, Petitioner, v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York et al.; and Metropolitan Securities Company, Petitioner, v. William W. Ladd, Receiver, etc.
November 15, 1909.
Mr. Julim T. Davies, Mr. Brainard Tolies and Mr. John C. Spooner for the Guaranty Trust Company of New York. Mr. Bronson Winthrop and Mr. Charles Thomas Payne for the Morton Trust Company. Mr. Richard Reid, Rogers for the Metropolitan Securities Com-' pany. Mr. Arthur H. Masten, Mr. Matthew C. Fleming, Mr. James Byrne, Mr. Frank H. Platt, Mr. J. Parker.Kirlin, Mr. W. M. Chadbourne and Mr. W. M. Coleman-ior respondents in Nos. 635 and 636, .and Mr. Joseph H. Choate, Mr. Arthur H. Masten and Mr. Robert C. Beatty for respondents in No. 654.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions, for writs of certiorari tp the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.