Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Batchelor et al. v. Stein, 1969 — 396 U.S. 954 · caselaw · US
General
Batchelor et al. v. Stein
396 U.S. 954·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 565.
Batchelor et al. v. Stein.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Hawthorne Phillips, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorney General, W. V. Oeppert, Henry Wade, Wilson Johnston, N. Alex Bickley, James E. Barlow, and Preston Dial for appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Tex. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument immediately following Nos. 11, 20, and 4 [No. 11, Samuels et al. v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al., and No. 20, Fernandez v. Mackell, District Attorney of Queens County, et al., restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 957; and No. 4, Younger, District Attorney of Los Angeles County v. Harris et al., restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 955].