General
AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS' OFFSET CORP. et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
379 U.S. 5·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS’ OFFSET CORP. et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
No. 152.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Harold Riegélman and H. H. Nordlinger for appellants.
Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for the City of New York et al., and Louis J. Lef-kowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hir-showitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Gustave Soderberg, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.