Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George D. Reed et al., Respondents, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 527 · caselaw · US
General
George D. Reed et al., Respondents, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
187 N.Y. 527·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George D. Reed et al., Respondents, v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Reported below, 116 App. Div. 921.
(Argued January 7, 1907;
decided January 15, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 7, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appellant had failed to perfect the appeal within a time stipulated:
George D. Reed for motion.
Chauncey J. Hamlin opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied on payment by appellant of ten dollars costs within ten days; the undertaking filed to stand subject to justification if excepted to.