Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Spero, Appellant, v. Katharina Schultz, as Executrix of Joseph Schultz, Deceased, Respondent, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Spero, Appellant, v. Katharina Schultz, as Executrix of Joseph Schultz, Deceased, Respondent
160 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Spero, Appellant, v. Katharina Schultz, as Executrix of Joseph Schultz, Deceased, Respondent.
(Argued June 21, 1899;
decided October 3, 1899.)
Spero v. Shultz, 14 App. Div. 423, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 27, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
Jacob Marks for appellant.
William U. Geiger for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.