Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gilbert M. Husted, Appellant, v. Edward Van Ness and David Thomson, as Trustees of the Estate of Benjamin Lord, Respondents, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 598 · caselaw · US
General
Gilbert M. Husted, Appellant, v. Edward Van Ness and David Thomson, as Trustees of the Estate of Benjamin Lord, Respondents
149 N.Y. 598·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gilbert M. Husted, Appellant, v. Edward Van Ness and David Thomson, as Trustees of the Estate of Benjamin Lord, Respondents.
(Argued May 25, 1896;
decided June 2, 1896.)
Motion to dismiss appeal.
Louis A. Noble for motion.
A. Edward Woodruff opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, provided that within twenty days after notice of this decision the respondent Van Ness pays the costs allowed by orders of April 2 and April 24,1896, and ten dollars costs of opposing this motion. Unless such payment is made within said period, the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.