Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ENERGY-INTENSIVE MANUFACTURERS WORKING GROUP ON GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION, et al., petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., 2013 — 134 S. Ct. 418 · caselaw · US
Administrative
ENERGY-INTENSIVE MANUFACTURERS WORKING GROUP ON GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION, et al., petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.
134 S. Ct. 418187 L. Ed. 2d 278·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ENERGY-INTENSIVE MANUFACTURERS WORKING GROUP ON GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION, et al., petitioners,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.
No. 12-1254.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 15, 2013.
Case below, 684 F.3d 102.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to the following question: "Whether EPA permissibly determined that its regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles triggered permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act for stationary sources that emit greenhouse gases." The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.