Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Heide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Candy and Confectionery Workers Union, Local 452, AFL, v. National Labor Relations Board, 1955 — 349 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Heide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Candy and Confectionery Workers Union, Local 452, AFL, v. National Labor Relations Board
349 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 749.
No. 783.
Henry Heide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Candy and Confectionery Workers Union, Local 452, AFL, v. National Labor Relations Board.
Godfrey P. Schmidt, Theodore Kiendl, William R. Meagher and Rufus D. McDonald for petitioner in No. 749.
Lawrence Kovalsky for petitioner in No. 783.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Rosanna A. Blake for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 219 F. 2d 46.