Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hanorah Sammons et al., as Administrators of William Sammons, Deceased, Respondents, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 583 · caselaw · US
General
Hanorah Sammons et al., as Administrators of William Sammons, Deceased, Respondents, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant
179 N.Y. 583·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hanorah Sammons et al., as Administrators of William Sammons, Deceased, Respondents, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant.
Sammons v. Ithaca Street By. Co., 88 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Argued October 13, 1904;
decided October 28, 1904.)
. Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 17, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a' motion for a new trial.
S. D. lialliclay for appellant.
P. F. McAllister and D. M. Dean for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.