General
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners, v. NEW YORK, et al.
139 S. Ct. 1316203 L. Ed. 2d 432·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners,
v.
NEW YORK, et al.
No. 18-966.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 15, 2019.
The parties are directed to brief and argue the following additional question: Whether the Secretary of Commerce's decision to add a citizenship question to the Decennial Census violated the Enumeration Clause of the U.S. Constitution, art. I, § 2, cl. 3. Respondents are allowed an additional 2,000 words in aggregate to address this question in their briefs on the merits. Petitioners are allowed an additional 1,000 words to address this question in their reply brief on the merits.