Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
D. E. Foote & Company, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Emerson C. Harrington, Governor of the State of Maryland, et al., 1918 — 246 U.S. 657 · caselaw · US
General
D. E. Foote & Company, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Emerson C. Harrington, Governor of the State of Maryland, et al.
246 U.S. 657·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 259.
D. E. Foote & Company, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Emerson C. Harrington, Governor of the State of Maryland, et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland.
Argued April 23, 24, 1918.
Decided April 29, 1918.
Mr. George Whitelock for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Ogle Mafbury and Mr. Albert C. Ritchie for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Bilby v. Stewart, ante, 255.